GROUND TEN: IMPROPER LINEUP PROCEDURES

 

            The construction and presentation of the photo lineup from which the defendant was identified was in violation of due process and the concept of a fair trial and information derived there from should have been excluded.

 

A. The Defendant Was Unfairly Highlighted In The Lineup

 

            Chapel was the only officer from the Northside Precinct placed into an 8-photo lineup. Every witness that viewed that lineup lived and worked in the Buford-Sugar Hill area where Chapel was permanently assigned and owned and operated a small business. At trial, Lt. John Latty attempted to defend the construction of the lineup. He maintained that there was no one in the Northside Precinct that sufficiently resembled Officer Chapel. How he could have overlooked Officer Brian Reddy indicates the insincerity of this position. Within the precinct, Chapel and Reddy were known as the D & D Twins. Doom and Destruction -- six hundred pounds of cops. The resemblance of the two was such that even their wives could not tell them apart at a distance unless they moved.

 

[John Latty, Trial, Page 4457, Line 19]

By Mr. Moore

Q.        Now, are you aware that the photo lineup that was showed to Mr. Kautter only had one officer from the Northside precinct in it?

A.        No, sir.  I don't recall who was in it.

Q.        Okay.

A.        Other than Chapel, I don't remember who else was in it.

Q.        Do you know the reason why there was nobody else that worked at the Northside precinct in that photo lineup?

A.        Well, when you do a photo lineup, what you're after is somebody -- you know, when you put them in there with your suspect, you want people who look very similar to him.  That's required.  In this particular case, we used police officers, and the police officers we selected were officers that we felt resembled, and I say we, I think Greg Thompson or somebody put that together.  He selected police officers that looked similar to Mike Chapel.  There was no thought given to who those officers were, just that they fit within the photo lineup in an acceptable way.

Q.        So it wasn't because Mike was your suspect that he was included in there and none of the other Northside precinct officers were?

A.        Well, he was a suspect, but the selection on who went in there with him was made based on the appearance of the officers, not where they worked or what their name was or anything.

Q.        Weren't there other officers in the Northside precinct that appeared similar to him?

A.        Probably, but there probably are a number of officers that appear similar to him, particularly if you're just looking at a shot of his face.

 

 

            The defendant was the only officer in the Northside Precinct permanently assigned at the request of city officials to the Buford-Sugar Hill area in which all of the eyewitnesses, especially the two who selected Chapel as a possible identification, Brusie and Kautter, resided and worked.

 

[Brusie, Trial, Page 3396, Line 22]

By Prosecutor Davis.

Q.        Dr. Brusie, how are you employed?

A.        At Equine Medical Center on Peachtree Industrial.

Q.        Now, what do you do there?

A.        I'm a staff surgeon there.

Q.        All right.  Where did you go to school, Doctor?

A.        Michigan State University.

Q.        Okay.  How long has the office been in its current location?

A.        Since February 1990.

Q.        All right.  And have you worked there at the location the entire time?

A.        Yes, sir.

Q.        All right.  Are you familiar with the Peachtree Industrial Boulevard area around Sugar Hill?

A.        Yes, sir.

Q.        All right.  And are you familiar with the location of the Gwinnco Muffler Shop up there on Peachtree Industrial Boulevard?

A.        Yes, sir.

 

 [Kautter, Trial, Page 3525, Line 24]

By Prosecutor Porter.

Q.        Mr. Kautter, where do you work?

A.        I'm self-employed.

Q.        What type of work do you do?

A.        I have a Mercedes repair shop.

Q.        And is that located in the Buford-Sugar Hill area in Gwinnett County?

A.        Yes, sir.

Q.        How long have you owned that business?

A.        Fifteen years.

Q.        And have you always been located in the north end of the county?

A.        For the most part, yes, sir.

Q.        Were you located there in April of 1993?

A.        Yes, sir.

Q.        And were you employed in this business in April of 1993?

A.        Yes, sir.

 

            Both eyewitnesses who identified Chapel at trial later remembered incidents where they had either met Chapel officially, in the performance of his duties, as was the case with Dr. Brusie, or had seen him in uniform, as was the case with Witness Kautter.

 

 

[Brusie, Trial, Page 3403, Line 21]

                        By. Ms. Rogan.

Q.        Okay.  Do you know Mr. Chapel?

A.        I don't believe so.  I mean, I don't --

Q.        Do you recognize him perhaps from an incident involving a horse that was hit by a car on Bogan Road out -- back in March of 1992?

A.        There were some police there and there was -- I had forgotten about that.  Yeah.  Uh-huh [affirmative].

Q.        So you do -- you have seen him before in his capacity as a police officer?

A.        Yes, ma'am.

 

            And Kautter:

 

 [Kautter, Trial, Page 3572, Line 9]

By Prosecutor Porter.

Q.        Okay.  Now, when you picked out the photograph of Mr. Chapel in that photo lineup, did you tell Officer Cline that you knew the man in the photograph?

A.        No.

Q.        Did you tell him you'd ever seen him before?

A.        No.

Q.        You had in fact seen him before, hadn't you?

A.        Two years prior to that --

Q.        Okay.

A.        -- at a fast food restaurant.

Q.        But you didn't tell the police that?

A.        No.

 

            Officer Chapel also had occasion to place Witness Kautter’s place of business was under surveillance for several days.

 

            When at a preliminary hearing witness Kautter was presented with a photo lineup of all 31 of the Northside Precinct’s officers, Chapel was only one of three photos selected, and the first photo selected by Kautter was that of Officer J.P. Morgan:

 

[Kautter, Trial, Page 3572, Line 21]

By Prosecutor Porter.

Q.        I've been provided photographs here marked D-14 through D-44 pursuant to subpoena from the Gwinnett County police department that these are -- the subpoena requested all the officers who worked at the Northside precinct.  And I'm going to show you three of these that you saw previously at a hearing and ask you if you remember those.  And if you would, use the numbers too when you identify them.  Turn them over and use the numbers --

A.        Okay.  To my knowledge, yes, these are the ones that I picked.

Q.        Okay.  And you picked some of those as resembling the people in the photographs that you -- the photographic lineup?

A.        One.

Q.        Okay.  And which one was that?

A.        D-38.

Q.        And did you -- you said the other two resembled somebody in the -- or one of them resembled somebody in the photo lineup, too.  Do you recall that?

A.        Yes.

Q.        Okay.  Do you remember which one it was?

A.        D-31, I believe.

 

 

B. Kautter’s Identification

 

            Witness Kautter saw the officer in the patrol car the night of the murder only in profile, and all of the officers in the 8-photo lineup were shown in full front with no indication of height or weight. Kautter first selected an officer not Chapel then, with no reaction from the officer presenting the lineup, remarked: “He is to tall or too thin” and then selected Chapel.

 

[Kautter, Trial, Page 3574, Line 18]

By Prosecutor Porter.

Q.        Now, when you looked at the photo lineup, did you immediately pick out Officer Chapel?

A.        No, sir.

Q.        And what did you do first?

A.        I had looked at another photograph of another individual on the bottom side of that Manila folder, and I had said at that time that this had looked like the individual, but he was too tall and skinny.  And then I went back to the top of that Manila folder and picked out the number three photo.

 

C. Sgt. Cline’s Presentation Of The Lineup

 

            Sgt. Cline the officer presenting the 8-photo lineup to Witness Kautter by all indications, including the affidavit signed by the witness, did not inform Kautter that the suspect may or may not have been in the lineup because Kautter selected Officer Chapel with the words: “I’ll have to say …”.  When asked this question, Kautter replied that he could not recall; however Officer Cline confirmed the witness’ statement:

 

[Kautter, Trial, Page 3574, Line 18]

By Prosecutor Porter.

Q.        Okay.  And you didn't tell the officer 'I'm sure that's him,' did you?

A.        No, sir.

Q.        You said something to the effect, 'I'll have to say that it's number three,' didn't you?

A.        I don't recall.

 

 [Cline, Trial, Page 4700, Line 12]

By Mr. Moore.

Q.        Officer Cline, my name is Johnny Moore, and I've got a few questions to ask you.

A.        Yes, sir.

Q.        Now, with reference to that photo lineup,        Mr. Kautter originally pointed to number seven first, didn't he?

A.        What he said to me, sir, once I presented it to him, he said -- he pointed to number seven and said, 'He's too thin.  I'll have to say it's number three.'

Q.        'I'll have to say it's number three'?

A.        Yes, sir.

Q.        That's his exact words?

A.        Yes, sir.  Those were his exact words, and then he signed the photo lineup affidavit and signed on it indicating number three.

Q.        Okay.  And you didn't ask him what he meant by, 'I'll have to say it's number three,' did you?

A.        No, sir.  It was -- it was just a conversational way of saying it.  In other words, he just said, 'I'll have to say it's number three.'  It wasn't, 'I have to say it's number three.'  He said, 'I'll have to say it's number three,' in that manner.

Q.        You didn't ask him if he was sure about that or anything, did you?

A.        No, sir, I did not.